U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein







Ways to Stay Informed

    Sign up for my
    E-Newsletter

    My Latest Report from     Washington

    Visiting Washington?     Have Breakfast With     Dianne

    Today in the Senate

    Washington D.C.
    Tours & Information


    Flag Requests

    Academy Nominations

    Intern Applications


    Scheduling

    Casework

    More California
    Resources


    Grants & Federal
    Domestic Assistance


 

Senator Feinstein Renews Call for
Federal Oxygenate Waiver for California

March 9, 2005
pdf version

Washington, DC – U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) today urged the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to grant California a waiver from the federal oxygenate requirement. The requirement forces California to blend its gasoline with ethanol, even though the State has the cleanest gasoline standards in the nation and using ethanol does not help reduce air pollution in the State.

Following is the text of a letter Senator Feinstein sent to Stephen Johnson, Acting Administrator and Administrator Designate of the Environmental Protection Agency, and the Administration’s new appointee to run the EPA:

March 8, 2005

The Honorable Stephen L. Johnson
Acting Administrator
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Ariel Rios Building
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20460

Dear Acting Administrator Johnson:

Congratulations on your nomination to be Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency. I look forward to working with you as your nomination proceeds in the Senate.

I wanted to make sure you are aware of an issue that I have been working on for the past five years: California’s application for a waiver from the federal oxygenate requirement. As you may know, California phased-out methyl tertiary-butyl ether (MTBE) in March 1999 due to its carcinogenic properties and the threat the additive poses to drinking water supplies. In April 1999, then-Governor Davis formally requested a waiver from the oxygenate mandate from the former EPA Administrator, Carol Browner.

On June 12, 2001 the Environmental Protection Agency denied California’s application for a waiver, stating that California did not clearly demonstrate what the impact on ozone would be if the waiver were granted. This decision was issued despite the fact that a January 2001 draft Federal Register notice by the EPA concluded that a partial California waiver would mean less smog-forming pollution than under the existing oxygenate rule.

California strongly disagrees with EPA’s final assessment. The State has the most stringent gasoline standards in the nation. California’s regulations accomplish the goals of the Clean Air Act, to reduce emissions and pollutants, without requiring a minimum level of oxygenate year-round. Yet without a waiver from the oxygenate requirement, California has been forced to replace MTBE with ethanol.

The California Air Resource Board (CARB) researched this issue at length and found that ethanol-blended gasoline does not help California meet the goals of the Clean Air Act as it relates to reducing ozone formation, particularly during the summertime, and, in fact, ethanol actually increases the emission of pollutants that cause ozone during the summer months.

The Secretary of the California Environmental Protection Agency quantified the impact of ethanol on air quality in a letter to me dated August 1, 2003:

"...our current best estimate is that the increase in the use of ethanol-blended gasoline has likely resulted in about a one percent increase in emissions of volatile organic gases (VOC) in the SCAQMD [South Coast Air Quality Management District] in the summer of 2003. Given the very poor air quality in the region and the great difficulty of reaching the current federal ozone standard by the required attainment date of 2010, an increase of this magnitude is of great concern. Clearly, these emission increases have resulted in higher ozone levels this year that what would have otherwise occurred, and are responsible for at least some of the rise in ozone levels that have been observed."

In September 2004, CARB sponsored a study by the Coordinating Research Council (CRC). The CRC issued a report entitled Fuel Permeation From Automotive Systems. The study was designed to determine the magnitude of the permeation differences between three fuels, containing MTBE, ethanol, or no oxygenate, in the selected test fleet. The study found that emissions increased on all 10 vehicle fuel systems studied when ethanol replaced the MTBE. In fact, the ethanol blended gasoline caused emissions to increase by 65% when compared with MTBE blended gasoline, and by 45% when compared with non-oxygenated gasoline.

In a November 2004 report, CARB staff issued a preliminary analysis of increased emissions due to ethanol blended gasoline. The staff reported that “on-road vehicles hydrocarbon emissions increase[d] by 40-50 tons/day, statewide, [in] 2004.” CARB staff is currently working on a final analysis of the impact of ethanol blended gasoline on emissions.

Over 90% of Californians breathe unhealthy air. The purpose of the federal reformulated gas program is to protect public health by reducing harmful vehicle emissions of smog-forming compounds and air toxics. I am concerned that the ethanol mandate in California limits CARB’s ability to issue the most effective regulations to best reduce air pollution from vehicles and to protect the health of all Californians.

The scientific evidence linking ethanol blended gasoline with air pollution continues to mount. It is time for the EPA to grant California a waiver from the federal oxygenate requirement. Even the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has told the EPA that it must reconsider its denial of the waiver. In fact, the Court said on July 17, 2003 that the Agency “abused its discretion in refusing to consider and weigh the effect of the proposed waiver on particulate matter pollution along with its effect on ozone levels.” At that time, I urged the EPA’s Acting Administrator to act quickly to grant California the oxygenate waiver. Unfortunately, the EPA took a different route and petitioned the Ninth Circuit to overturn the July 17th decision. On October 30, 2003 , the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals denied the EPA’s petition and remanded the waiver request back to the EPA.

As I have conveyed to your predecessors, it is my sincere hope that the legal wrangling will end and the EPA will expeditiously grant California a waiver from the federal oxygenate requirement.

Thank you for your prompt attention to my request and I look forward to your reply.

Sincerely,

Dianne Feinstein
United States Senator

 

###

Home News Site Map Contact Me Issue Updates