| Legislative Notice 6A | April 9, 1997 |
S. 104 - Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1997
Calendar No. 27
Update . . . Update . . . Update
Senator Murkowski has reached an agreement with Senator Bingaman on a substitute for S. 104 that contains the following seven changes from S. 104, as reported. (For details on the bill as reported, see RPC's Legislative Notice No. 6, dated March 20, 1997.)
On April 7, 1997, the Office of Management and Budget transmitted a message to the Congress, indicating that the President would veto the bill if it were presented to him in its current form. It is not yet clear whether the Murkowski/Bingaman substitute, if adopted, will be sufficient for the President.
The majority staff of the Energy and Natural Resources Committee has provided this summary of the changes being made to the reported bill under the Murkowski/Bingaman substitute.
The substitute would allow the Secretary of Energy to set the limit, based upon amount needed to accommodate fill rates. The initial capacity (assuming 2015 ready date) would be 33,100 metric tons of uranium, and is adjustable.
The substitute delays these dates as follows: If Yucca Mountain is viable, construction will begin December 31, 2001, and operating by June 30, 2003. If Yucca Mountain is not viable, construction will begin December 31, 2003, and operations by June 30, 2005.
The substitute authorizes the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to be involved in setting the radiation protection standard. Based on a risk methodology, the standard will be between 25 and 30 millirem.
The substitute retains the provision for a single Environmental Impact Statement, and requires generic analysis of impacts of transporting used fuel to the storage facility.
The substitute applies a Hazmat-type approach, which balances state and federal law, allowing preemption of state and local laws only where state intransigence prevents the federal purpose.
The substitute establishes a user fee, also capped at 1 mill per kilowatt-hour, starting in FY 2000 and continuing through FY 2003; then current law is reinstated for FY 2004 and FY 2005; and the user fee is re-imposed for years after FY 2005. One-time payments will be due September 30, 2002.
The substitute removes this express language and substitutes a "sense of Congress resolution" urging the parties to settle their differences.
______________________________________