|
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: September 12, 2002
SCHUMER TO CUSTOMS DEPARTMENT: WHY WAS URANIUM SMUGGLED INTO
NEW YORK HARBOR?
Schumer calls on Customs Service to step up port safety measures
immediately, sends letter to Commissioner
declaring"gaping holes"in current procedures
In test of port safety investigations, news crew smuggled 15
pounds of harmless uranium with chemical makeup similar to that
used for nuclear weapons
US Senator Charles E. Schumer today took the U.S. Customs Service
to task, calling for stepped up port security measures and asking
Commissioner Richard C. Bonner how his inspectors allowed a news
crew to smuggle detectable uranium into the ports of the New York
Harbor. The uranium sample went undetected because the shipping
manifest of the cargo container it traveled in said it held "household
goods" and did not arouse the suspicion of Customs officials.
"If Al Qaeda wasn't sure that a nuclear device could get into
the United States before last night, they are now," Schumer
said. "No one doubts that today's terrorist groups have the
technical expertise to make a nuclear device and what last night's
news report showed was that if a terrorist group gets its hand on
enough weapons grade uranium, it can sneak it into one of our harbors.
Each day that the government leaves security holes at our ports
unplugged is another day that it's playing Russian roulette with
our safety."
Schumer said the success of an ABC news crew in smuggling the uranium
into New York exposed gaping holes in our nation's port security,
and is particularly disturbing because it occurred in New York,
where threats are higher than anywhere else. Schumer said there
were glaring holes in the nation's port security infrastructure.
While over 95% of US overseas trade is conducted at the nation's
361 international seaports, just 3% of total cargo is inspected,
creating the potential for terrorists to bring in weapons of mass
destruction including nuclear, chemical and biological weapons,
and making the ports and cities that house them highly vulnerable
to terrorist acts. US ports currently receive no federal funding
for security infrastructure, even though the nation's total port
volume is expected to double over the next twenty years.
Ports across the nation are threatened by uncontrolled access to
key areas, a lack of vital security equipment like small boats,
cameras and vessel tracking devices, and poor intelligence sharing
between local and federal agencies. Last year, the Interagency Commission
on Crime and Security at US Seaports issued a report stating that
security at US seaports ranges from poor to fair. Additionally,
many passenger ships hold up to 5,000 people, making lax port security
a threat to the passengers as well as the cities that house the
ports. These weaknesses, Schumer said, all make ports an inviting
target for terrorist activity.
Six months ago, Customs launched a plan to place agents at the
20 largest foreign ports to inspect cargo before it gets to the
US. To date, however, Customs has placed agents at only four foreign
ports Singapore, Rotterdam, Le Havre and Antwerp. Even worse,
no special security measures have been put in place at the largest
container ports in the country, including New York which is the
largest on the East Coast.
Schumer urged Customs to back measures to fund the research and
development of sophisticated technology to detect nuclear devices
which may be smuggled into US ports. Schumer has introduced legislation
that would provide $250 million for that effort with Virginia Senator
John Warner. The bill would also impose stricter cargo reporting
standards, increased penalties for unreported cargo, more manual
inspections of cargo and merchandise, and the purchase of over 100
new mobile X-ray scanning devices.
"It is our responsibility to ensure that the American people
feel safe and are safe," Senator Schumer wrote in a letter
to Customs Commissioner Bonner. "Particularly in this time
of heightened alert, we must address these lapses in our security
before it's too late. The ABC News test raises the following questions:
Why didn't Customs officials look inside this particular container?
Are cleverly or vaguely worded shipping manifests all it takes to
smuggle goods into our ports via container? What steps is your department
taking to improve the system of choosing which containers are inspected?"
Schumer also faulted House and Senate negotiators on being slow
to reach agreement on how to pay for a measure to improve port security.
Last year, the Senate approved a $600-800 million plan for US port
security improvements whereby small user fees would be taken on
all port shipments as part of the Seaport and Maritime Security
Act of 2001. With the Port of New York as the largest and busiest
port complex on the East Coast -- housing nearly 10,000 ships per
year -- New York would receive a large portion of this federal funding.
House Republicans have thus far refused to support the fee schedule.
For a copy of Schumer's letter to Commissioner Bonner click here.
####
|