Skip Content
U.S. Flag

Special Committee to Investigate Air Mail and Ocean Mail Contracts

Senator Hugo Black

Resolution passed: February 25, 1933

Chairman: Hugo Black (D-AL)

Committee members:

Warren Austin (R-VT)
William King (D-UT)
Patrick McCarran (D-NV)
Wallace White, Jr. (R-ME)

Chapter 1: Origins
Chapter 2: Process
Chapter 3: Public Relations
Chapter 4: Investigation
Chapter 5: Outcome

In 1932, with the nation in the grips of a crippling economic depression, members of Congress pledged to rein in federal spending. High on the list of proposed cuts was $16 million in federal subsidies to finance national air mail service. Intended as incentives to bolster the fledgling passenger airline and merchant marine industries, the subsidies had been criticized as government giveaways to friends and associates of the Herbert Hoover administration.

The November 1932 election handed the Democrats control of the Senate, the House of Representatives, and the White House. During the lame duck months of the 72nd Congress, as the Democratic minority prepared to become the majority, the Senate's Democratic floor leader, Senator Joe Robinson of Arkansas, proposed an in-depth study of the air and ocean mail contracts awarded by the Hoover administration. The postmaster general's decision to award four new contracts in the last weeks of the Hoover administration, despite the explicit objection of congressional committees, furthered congressional resolve to investigate.

On February 25, 1933, the Senate approved Alabama Senator Hugo Black's resolution 349, to establish a special investigatory committee to inquire into the government's system of awarding of air and ocean mail contracts. The new Democratic majority in the Senate organized the committee at the convening of the 73rd Congress on March 4, 1933, and members were selected by the new president of the Senate, Vice President John N. Garner. Garner appointed Black to chair the investigation. The resolution authorized the committee to examine the possibility of altering or cancelling existing contracts, to explore the salaries paid to officers, executives, and employees, to inquire as to the financial status of corporations receiving subsidies, and to ascertain whether companies had actively lobbied public officials for subsidies.

Public Relations
When the special committee uncovered evidence that air mail contracts had not been awarded on a competitive basis, President Franklin Roosevelt asked Congress for the authority to cancel existing government mail contracts. With the passage of the Air Mail Act of 1934, Congress authorized the secretary of war to make military airplanes, landing strips, pilots, and equipment available to the postmaster general for the transportation of air mail. Tragically, in the following weeks, several army planes flying U.S. mail crashed, severely wounding some pilots and killing others. One newspaper headline read: "Hasty cancellation of mail contracts means the needless loss of lives of courageous Army Pilots." Some Americans blamed Black's committee for the pilots' deaths. The committee struggled over the ensuing years to regain the support of the American public.

During the early months of the inquiry, investigators uncovered evidence that top level officials in the Hoover administration, including Postmaster General Walter F. Brown and his deputy, William P. MacCracken, drafted legislation granting the postmaster general broad authority in the awarding of mail contracts. Congress had approved the administration's bill, known as the McNary-Watres Act, in 1930. Black's investigators found that, shortly after the bill's approval, Brown and MacCracken invited airline chiefs to Washington, many of whom were personal friends, and awarded them air mail contracts without a formal bidding process. Brown and MacCraken held stocks of several corporations that directly benefited from these contracts. Reporters later dubbed the meeting the "Spoils Conference."

When called to testify before the committee, "Spoils Conference" participants proved uncooperative. MacCracken, who then worked as legal counsel to an airline that had received such a contract, declined to provide documents requested by the committee. He asserted that some papers were protected by attorney-client privilege. Relying on the McGrain v. Dougherty Supreme Court decision, the Black committee appealed to the Senate, which approved Senate Resolution 143, granting the committee the power to subpoena persons and papers "of all individuals, associates, partnerships, or corporations" involved in air mail and ocean mail contracting with the U.S. government. MacCracken still refused to cooperate and permitted some documents to be removed from his office and destroyed. The Senate authorized the sergeant at arms to arrest MacCracken and three others, and to impound their papers and correspondence.

Facing such firm opposition, Chairman Black relied on the creativity of committee investigators to secure the vital evidence. In one case, two postal workers sorted through trash bags searching for scraps of subpoenaed papers. After hours of tedious work, they succeeded in piecing several documents back together and the reassembled letters were found to contain information relevant to the investigation. The committee charged four men with contempt for attempting to destroy subpoenaed materials. The Senate found two of those men, including MacCracken, in contempt of Congress and held them in the District of Columbia jail for 10 days. A Supreme Court decision, Jurney v. MacCracken (1935), upheld Congress's right to punish private citizens for contempt.

The Black committee's final reports found that all parties bore some responsibility for the corrupt practice of awarding air and ocean mail contracts. The committee blamed legislators for drafting and passing "ill-advised" laws. It singled out public officials, such as Walter Brown, who "flagrantly betrayed their trust and maladministered those laws," and accused individuals "publicly posing as patriots" for taking advantage of those laws for their "private profit." The committee recommended implementing a program of competitive bidding for air and ocean mail contracts and reducing or eliminating taxpayer subsidies, believing these measures would save the government "millions of dollars…in the future." Based on the committee's exhaustive inquiry, Congress passed legislation to reform existing laws and practices in the years following the air mail and ocean mail inquiry.

In addition to saving American taxpayers money, Congress designed new laws to provide greater oversight of the awarding of mail contracts and of the development of fledgling industries such as passenger air service and the U.S. merchant marine. Senators Hugo Black and Kenneth McKellar co-authored air mail legislation in 1934. Signed by the president on June 12, the Air Mail Act of 1934 established a commission tasked with making recommendations to Congress concerning the development of a national aviation policy. It restricted the postmaster general and other top officials from granting contracts to companies in which they had a personal financial interest. The Air Mail Act of 1935 granted the Interstate Commerce Commission oversight of contracts and provided for the annual review of "rates of compensation," and "all forms of expenditures of said companies" of those agreements. The Merchant Marine Act of 1936 created the U.S. Maritime Commission and provided for the "development and maintenance of an adequate and well-balanced American merchant marine, to promote the commerce of the United States [and] to aid in the national defense."

Print Version with Footnotes

Return to Investigations Menu